With our two-pronged online learning efforts in Iowa -- online professional development and K-12 online learning -- many educators are inquiring about the process of creating an online course. Does it take a lot of time? A lot of skill? How would one even start?
The problem of course, is that in all cases, the answer is "it depends". But, that doesn't help very much at all. So instead, I've started using my necklace-maker analogy. (Yes, I know. Necklaces. But as my oldest would say, "Dad, you don't have to worry, you sacrificed your manly credentials long ago).
THE GOLD NECKLACE
One place many start with is the purchase of a gold necklace. It is already put together, wrought into an interlinked set of links which would make using any of the parts separately very difficult. You can use this right out of the jewelry box if you would like, although putting your own shine on it, through adding some specialized vocabulary to the glossary or some specialized instructions wouldn't hurt.
In this case, the Gold Necklace is the Apex, Plato, or E2020 that is out there (or their professional development-side counterparts). And the Gold Necklace comes with its set of benefits and drawbacks.
Most obvious, it is easy to do. Go to the store and buy it. You have to learn how to close the clasp, but you don't have to build it -- or know how to build it -- at all. Also, you have a good sense that it will look pretty good. The individualized pieces are indistinguishable and are expertly put together to look that way.
On the minus side, though, what qualifies for "gold" now days isn't always a certainty. My youngest daughter in fact is right now showing me her "gold" necklace that she won at Chuck E. Cheese's. And while it looks fairly good (gold-colored shiny metal linked together), the quality of those links beyond their looks isn't very high. Many of the packaged courses are the same way. Their assessments are low-level multiple choice questions, their activities require little imagination, and most of the "learning in the course" is simple delivery from the content into the student's mind. They don't employ constructivist learning very well. Now... that isn't all the packaged courses, but it is more than you would think. You need to examine the quality of the gold before you purchase.
Also, you pretty much have to use them as is. You can't go and add your own links, unless you have specialized skill (instead of a goldsmith, of course, you would need a web designer). Some teachers will go and add their own items and links to a packaged course, and the end result is predictable. It is like adding some plastic charms to the gold necklace. It doesn't fit very well.
And most of all... you have to buy it. They can be very expensive, and in the case of many, that expense is an annual cost.
THE HEMP NECKLACE
The exact opposite of this is the do-it-yourself, build from scratch hemp necklace. I actually have some skill in this area. Camp counseling pays off... well, not literally.
Here, you are starting with very basic building tools, and creating the necklace with a series of knots over and over. It is a very time-intensive task which, for some, is a fun thing to build laboriously. If you are really good, you can get quite elaborate with your knots, but many make a very basic and uninspiring necklace.
Similarly with a do-it-yourself course, you start with some beginner tools, like what Moodle provides. Some become sophisticated and use Moodle's advanced features, like interactive databases, collaborative glossaries, and grouping features. Others stick with what amounts to copying their Microsoft Word files from their face-to-face class and pasting them in a sequence of Moodle webpages... the basic knot.
The disadvantages might be very apparent. It is very time intensive. It is not often very pretty, except for the maker, where it can become a symbol of pride outstripping the actual worth of the course. And, it can be something people try to build for a few hours and then throw it away as the end product wasn't meeting their idea of what it would be.
But, don't overlook this option. The quality of the content, and more importantly, the instruction can be outstanding. More so than packaged courses, the activities can be constructivistically built, collaborative in nature, and very adaptable to student needs. In fact, this course can be adjusted and tweaked extremely easily, even in the middle of a course. And perhaps most importantly, these courses aren't sterile. You can embed within them a personality, like the "teacher who loves Disney so much that every lesson contains a Disneyworld analogy." This is what students remember and respond to in the long run more than the initial flash and glitter.
THE BEADED NECKLACE
This is a bit in the middle. Here, you find beads, which can be low-cost or free in many situations. The craft comes in stringing them together to make the finished necklace. Each bead can be taken in with the viewer's eye by itself, and then can be seen as a whole. And while you still have some flexibility in this option, it also is quite a time saver over knotting-it-yourself.
In the instructional design world, this means an instructor looks for reusable learning objects, of which there are many available. In fact, there are some large repositories out there, featuring a variety of end products: lessons, simulations, activities, surveys, pre-assessments, databases, and more. In most cases, these are free, and of great interactivity and high quality.
The talent is in weaving these together. Novice instructors will find the shiniest of these and try to string them up into a necklace, but the pieces don't fit together nicely... it is too difficult for the viewer's eyes to move from one bead to the next without getting lost, so to speak. More seasoned instructors selectively choose the beads that do fit together in a nice pattern, and then subtly weaves them together with transitional instructions, reflective activities, and a tied-in overall theme to the course. In this case, the instructor has a good sense of what the overall effect of the necklace is to be (the end outcomes of the course), and all the fitting together is done with that purpose in mind.
As mentioned, the danger is getting too focused on the individual bead and not focused on the overall necklace, and there is a talent in the art of weaving it together. Plus, it can be difficult for new teachers to find the beads they are looking for. But overall, this system is what I'm advocating, since it allows for all the benefits of the Gold Necklace and the Hemp Necklace. It involves high levels of design without requiring specialized design skills and maintaining flexibility. And it provides the opportunity for the necklace to retain its character, over a stock gold necklace. Students are more likely to have positive feelings about the course. And finally, it represents a low-cost, low-time solution.
THE PEARL NECKLACE
I'm morphing my analogy over time, and the latest is the addition of the Pearl Necklace. Like the beaded necklace, you are finding the learning objects and stringing them together. However here, by using a growing number of tools out there, you are able to make them look uniform in their design, much like a set of pearls.
Some low-maintenance tools like Adobe Captivate or Lesson Builder allow you to embed easily the learning objects you find. Think of a series of YouTube videos. These tools allow you to easily embed them within a common package, so those lessons look more uniform. But basically, you are not doing any more work (as the oyster would be quick to interject).
In years past, this wasn't a feasible option, since I'd only put Moodle as a low-maintenance, low-skill tool, and its lesson features aren't in the "pearl" class. But these other "rapid e-learning development" tools are now becoming available, and what was never an option for teachers is now becoming one.
WHICH SHOULD YOU USE?
As mentioned, the answer is, "it depends". You have to look at the urgency to get it out, the skill of the instructor in instructional design, the overall quality and level of instruction you are after, and the funding you have.
Long term, though, education will move towards the last two... the beaded or pearl necklace. I'll admit my impartiality here, since I taught this way even in a face-to-face class, where I eschewed textbooks in favor of weaving together some online mini-lessons into the context of interactive student activities. I saw in that method of teaching a vibrant learning atmosphere, filled with unpredictability and discovery for students, and one that mimicked real life much better than an "all-laid-out-for-you" textbook. It gave me the opportunity to teach more so than merely make sure students were reading the book properly. And, that is where our online courses need to be for our online instructors to truly work to their potential.
(Gold Necklace photo by Tiffany Day. Beaded Necklace photo by Sweet Stuff by Ashlley. Pearl Necklace photo by Millica Sekulic).
Showing posts with label e-learning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label e-learning. Show all posts
Friday, April 15, 2011
Thursday, December 2, 2010
The Danger of Online Teacher Overcompensation
Re-read the overview of Rena Palloff's and Keith Pratt's "Building Online Learning Communities" in preparation for a course I'm teaching. Really struck by the following quote:
Hmmm... very true. It's the same as when you are 16, and your parents hesitantly give you the car keys, assuming the worst. And you drive the speed limit and signal a full 10 seconds before changing lanes, and keep more than proper following distance, all in the efforts to prove yourself a safe driver.
This having to prove yourself ends up having a detrimental effect on the student and the effectiveness of the course, and becomes just as much an issue as the lack of robustness in the first place.
"Many teachers feel that the online classroom is simply not as robust or rigorous and not worthy of consideration, a belief that has caused those of us who teach online to overcompensate and create classes so full of content and activities that sometimes our students simply cannot keep up."
Hmmm... very true. It's the same as when you are 16, and your parents hesitantly give you the car keys, assuming the worst. And you drive the speed limit and signal a full 10 seconds before changing lanes, and keep more than proper following distance, all in the efforts to prove yourself a safe driver.
This having to prove yourself ends up having a detrimental effect on the student and the effectiveness of the course, and becomes just as much an issue as the lack of robustness in the first place.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Establishing Online Community and Virtual Office Hours: A Case Study
I had the opportunity to sit in on Brad Niebling's Virtual Office Hours this morning. Brad is the alignment consultant at Heartland AEA and has been chairing the Iowa Department of Education's work on the Iowa Core with alignment.
Brad has a unique challenge in front of him. He is by all accounts the expert in this area in the state (at least at the K-12 level). And, unfortunately, alignment is not a topic that many are voluntarily flocking to in the state. Brad wants to build awareness, understanding, and interest in alignment across the state, where individuals can learn and discuss with each other. And therefore needs to overcome limits in time and geography.
In essence, Brad wants to create an online community.
He's taking a new spin on professional development which could have a big impact on future professional development in the state, especially as we begin to see fewer and fewer consultants being asked to serve more educators. He can best bring about this awareness, understanding and interest, not in some isolated presentations and courses, but by connecting things together, and allowing the internet to serve as a great on-ramp for getting people up to speed. Here's what he is doing.
1. GOOGLE SITE.
Brad is not a programmer and mentioned he has limited webpage design skills. So instead, he has used Google's easy, intuitive interface to make a site for all things alignment. This site not only has documentation he has created, but is eschewing an info-dump in favor of a learning experience. When visitors attend, they are part of a conversation.
How so? Take a peek. He is using interactive surveys for participant feedback. He has gathered testimonial stories from curriculum directors in the state, sharing their experiences with others. He is utilizing screen-cast tutorials to help participants navigate the ICAT alignment tool. He has a FAQ. Brad's site is a model of how to make interactive websites for educators, without any knowledge of flash, javascript, or other programming languages.
2. TWITTER.
Brad (@bniebling) has a good emerging presence on Twitter. The social media serves him in many ways here. First, he can use it as a method to give quick feedback to questions, sharing those questions with all his followers at once. Twitter's constant conversation makes it a more ongoing learning experience than his Google Site. Simply put, an educator might not check into the Google Site to catch the latest update, but those will come across the Twitterfeed.
Twitter enables Brad to leverage national expertise in alignment as well. I'll be honest... I know little about alignment and even less of where to go to get current research in the area. That's okay, though. Brad tells me where it is, through his retweets.
And of course, Twitter serves as a promotional piece of communication, as people through connections will eventually get connected to Brad even if they weren't to ever stumble on the Google Site. Which helps Brad promote...
3. VIRTUAL OFFICE HOURS.
As I mentioned, his latest effort is to create a virtual session (using Adobe Connect Pro) where he answers questions or conducts conversation about alignment with whomever stops in. When I peeked into his virtual office this morning, he was in conversation with a local curriculum director about some recent developments with the Iowa Core.
Brad has structured the room so that he can show his desktop for step-by-step demonstrations, field questions from an ongoing chat stream, point participants to various resources and links, all while talking via his computer speakers with passers-by. Brad's next virtual office hours, by the way, will be on Nov. 23 from 2:00-3:00.
THE IMPACT?
I believe this to be the future of consultation and leadership in the state. An online community of educators, interacting through synchronous tools, social media, and online resources, makes for a much more flexible system to join and a more constant conversation. Think about an AEAs team of literacy consultants, for example, having a weekly webinar to field questions from teachers or demonstrate some latest techniques or resources in quality literacy instruction. And then, coupling that with an ongoing dialogue in a social media format, be it Twitter or a social network.
There is a similar model being employed by the University of Georgia, whose Bridges program has been connecting teachers for almost a decade now. When I visited with Julie Moore, an assistant professor who has coordinated the system, she mentioned the research they have conducted points overwhelmingly to the facilitator of the community as the linchpin to the community's success. Good facilitators had thriving communities, and not-so-thriving communities lacked that good facilitator.
Moore identified 3 key factors to that lead to a good facilitator:
1. Enthusiasm and vigilance towards the importance of the community's focus
2. The ability to connect with people and make them feel involved
3. The willingness to devote the time necessary
Note, there wasn't anything about being an expert in certain technologies, or even an expert in the subject area. Instead, it was more about the creativity of getting people connected, and doing so because of a passion for the subject.
So, while Brad continues his work in these areas, it isn't as simple for other consultants to go create a Google Site, Twitter account, and Virtual Office Hours. They have to start with the essential ingredients above.
Brad has a unique challenge in front of him. He is by all accounts the expert in this area in the state (at least at the K-12 level). And, unfortunately, alignment is not a topic that many are voluntarily flocking to in the state. Brad wants to build awareness, understanding, and interest in alignment across the state, where individuals can learn and discuss with each other. And therefore needs to overcome limits in time and geography.
In essence, Brad wants to create an online community.
He's taking a new spin on professional development which could have a big impact on future professional development in the state, especially as we begin to see fewer and fewer consultants being asked to serve more educators. He can best bring about this awareness, understanding and interest, not in some isolated presentations and courses, but by connecting things together, and allowing the internet to serve as a great on-ramp for getting people up to speed. Here's what he is doing.
1. GOOGLE SITE.
Brad is not a programmer and mentioned he has limited webpage design skills. So instead, he has used Google's easy, intuitive interface to make a site for all things alignment. This site not only has documentation he has created, but is eschewing an info-dump in favor of a learning experience. When visitors attend, they are part of a conversation.
How so? Take a peek. He is using interactive surveys for participant feedback. He has gathered testimonial stories from curriculum directors in the state, sharing their experiences with others. He is utilizing screen-cast tutorials to help participants navigate the ICAT alignment tool. He has a FAQ. Brad's site is a model of how to make interactive websites for educators, without any knowledge of flash, javascript, or other programming languages.
2. TWITTER.
Brad (@bniebling) has a good emerging presence on Twitter. The social media serves him in many ways here. First, he can use it as a method to give quick feedback to questions, sharing those questions with all his followers at once. Twitter's constant conversation makes it a more ongoing learning experience than his Google Site. Simply put, an educator might not check into the Google Site to catch the latest update, but those will come across the Twitterfeed.
Twitter enables Brad to leverage national expertise in alignment as well. I'll be honest... I know little about alignment and even less of where to go to get current research in the area. That's okay, though. Brad tells me where it is, through his retweets.
And of course, Twitter serves as a promotional piece of communication, as people through connections will eventually get connected to Brad even if they weren't to ever stumble on the Google Site. Which helps Brad promote...
3. VIRTUAL OFFICE HOURS.
As I mentioned, his latest effort is to create a virtual session (using Adobe Connect Pro) where he answers questions or conducts conversation about alignment with whomever stops in. When I peeked into his virtual office this morning, he was in conversation with a local curriculum director about some recent developments with the Iowa Core.
Brad has structured the room so that he can show his desktop for step-by-step demonstrations, field questions from an ongoing chat stream, point participants to various resources and links, all while talking via his computer speakers with passers-by. Brad's next virtual office hours, by the way, will be on Nov. 23 from 2:00-3:00.
THE IMPACT?
I believe this to be the future of consultation and leadership in the state. An online community of educators, interacting through synchronous tools, social media, and online resources, makes for a much more flexible system to join and a more constant conversation. Think about an AEAs team of literacy consultants, for example, having a weekly webinar to field questions from teachers or demonstrate some latest techniques or resources in quality literacy instruction. And then, coupling that with an ongoing dialogue in a social media format, be it Twitter or a social network.
There is a similar model being employed by the University of Georgia, whose Bridges program has been connecting teachers for almost a decade now. When I visited with Julie Moore, an assistant professor who has coordinated the system, she mentioned the research they have conducted points overwhelmingly to the facilitator of the community as the linchpin to the community's success. Good facilitators had thriving communities, and not-so-thriving communities lacked that good facilitator.
Moore identified 3 key factors to that lead to a good facilitator:
1. Enthusiasm and vigilance towards the importance of the community's focus
2. The ability to connect with people and make them feel involved
3. The willingness to devote the time necessary
Note, there wasn't anything about being an expert in certain technologies, or even an expert in the subject area. Instead, it was more about the creativity of getting people connected, and doing so because of a passion for the subject.
So, while Brad continues his work in these areas, it isn't as simple for other consultants to go create a Google Site, Twitter account, and Virtual Office Hours. They have to start with the essential ingredients above.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Online Learning Initiatives in Iowa
(My presentation given to the Statewide Leadership Teams)
Online learning initiatives in iowa
View more presentations from Evan Abbey.
1. Iowa Core materials on Moodle
The Iowa Core professional development, alignment, and assessment for learning sub-committees have been placing their resources and instructor guides on the Heartland Moodle server (will soon be on the statewide Moodle server).
2. ARRA
The state has been awarded $2.7 million for the developing our capacity to deliver K-12 online content. This includes content development/acquisition, professional development, and technological support. An overview of the grant can be found here
3. OLLIE
The AEA Online Council is developing a PD sequence for online pedagogy, called Online Learning for Iowa Educators (OLLIE). There has been a proposal to offer a cohort for curriculum consultants from the statewide team this spring, with the purpose being common collaboration to create PD content, K-12 content, and prepare consultants to teach online. If you have personal interest in this, contact me and for more info, check out here.
4. ITSI-SU
Heartland AEA is currently participating in a National Science Foundation grant coordinated by the Concord Consortium. The grant is looking at the use of digital tools (including a portal and simulations) to enhance inquiry science. It is entitled “Innovative Technology in Science Inquiry – Scale-Up” (ITSI-SU). While the grant is paying for a piloting group to receive stipends and digital probes for their involvement, the online tools are available freely to all teachers. If there is statewide interest, Evan Abbey and Rob Kleinow can train other consultants in a “train-the-trainer” model.
For more information, visit http://www.concord.org/projects/itsi-su
To see and try out the portal, visit http://itsi.portal.concord.org/signin/
Labels:
e-learning,
Iowa Core,
professional development
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





