Tuesday, March 17, 2009

21st Century Skill: Being Curious


From Angela Maiers on curiosity:

Champion learners are curious about everything. They ask questions and get themselves involved in all stages of learning, without worrying about the answer, but relishing in the process. They have learned that by posing questions, they can generate interest and aliveness in the most exciting or mundane situation. This inquisitive attitude fuels their unrelenting quest for continuous learning.

I use the term curiosity-based education, which is different than outcome-based education. Different, not opposite. We need a clear set of outcomes that we want students to achieve, and we need to measure and give students feedback on their progress toward those outcomes. But, we have to interweave in room for curiosity.

No, not just room, but support. Time. And, purpose. We have to say "this curriculum will be driven partially by student curiosity".

This isn't the same as relevance, where the teacher takes the directed curriculum and tries to make it relevant. In this case, students follow curriculum of their own interest, and teachers follow along, incorporating the necessary skills and knowledge that accompany it.

The principles behind this are seen in both the Montessori method of education, and the work or Joseph Renzulli. It is an essential concept in gifted education. But, as Renzulli attests, it isn't just for gifted students... or if it is, we need to expand our definition of giftedness.

Renzulli advocated for what he labeled as Type III enrichment, where students would embark on self-selected projects, individually or in groups, that they are curious about. Teachers would provide Type I and Type II enrichment, which boils down teachers providing students to understand the necessary content to pursue that activity and give them appropriate experiences (say, for the student who wanted to overhaul an engine, the teacher would provide them not only the specifics on how to do so, but also get them in contact with local mechanics to serve as a mentor).

Not allowing for curiosity to drive the curriculum is sure to stifle it. Look at the relative effect of this over the lifespan of a student, who moves from the most curiosity-driven environments in kindergarten to the least in high school.

Being curious is a critical element to the "life-long learner" mantra that exists ubiquitously in all our vision statements. We need to make sure our curriculum allows for it.

4 comments:

Angela Maiers said...

Evan-

I love the term "curiosity- based" education. I wholeheartedly agree that if we do not consider curiosity as an integral part of the teaching and learning cycle, we will surely stifle it.


I believe that most would agree that curiosity is a critical element of "life-long learning", the struggle is conceptualizing and creating curiosity-driven environments that exist beyond KG classrooms.

It is my hope for the Iowa Core conversations, that they will support teachers in developing both the content of the core and the application of the process.

You are doing great work, Evan, in advocating exactly that! Keep on!

tagmirror said...

Evan-
I love it! I have a student who is putting together a compare/contrast on Google Docs vs. Zoho Docs. He's having trouble organizing his thoughts. Last night I found http://bubbl.us as a mind mapping webapp, but didn't get much time to really explore its potential. I saw that it would work for what I needed and got him going on it this morning while I went in another room to do some testing with other students.

I came back 30 minutes later and he spent 10 minutes showing me all that he had learned about the webapp. I've opened a can of worms with this compare/contrast. He can't decide which of the "cool new tools" that "he discovered" that he wants to compare/contrast.

Love the curiosity of my kids!

-Russ

Evan Abbey said...

Russ-

Excellent! I have got to get over sometime to see the great work you are doing with your students!

Tom Liam Lynch said...

Evan,
I've been reading Disrupting Class by Christensen et al., which uses the language intrinsic motivation v. extrinsic motivation to describe one of the problems facing education. As an English teacher, I've noticed this in the way students lose the drive to read around 6/7 grade. I suspect that it is do, in part, to a shift in a curiosity-based approach to reading (iconic of elementary ed) to an analysis-based approach (iconic of secondary ed). In short, once we ask students to "identify the literary devices" we begin expecting right interpretations of literature and students pull away. Thanks for the posting. I'm adding you to my Google Reader! -TLL